@RareBonkers
We hate AI
Tweet analysis of OpenAI's Sora shutdown: 45.30% support and 19.46% confrontation. Highlights losses, sub-500K users, Disney's reaction and pivot to robotics.
Details on the death of OpenAI's Sora: • Video generator was losing ~$1M per day • It had fewer than 500K users • Disney execs were informed of the shutdown less than an hour before it was announced • Disney is now in talks with over a dozen companies to implement AI • The Sora team is shifting focus to longer-term bets like robotics (via @WSJ)
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
burn on fewer than 500K users exposed unsustainable unit economics — the math never supported a long-term consumer business.
, raw capability couldn’t overcome distribution, retention and monetization failures.
whoever owns the workflow and integration will win, not the flashiest demo.
highlighted broken partnership management and the risk of building on "rented land."
, many see this as an invitation for rivals to build a radically cheaper cost structure and capture studio deals.
as smarter, long-term allocation of scarce compute and talent; others call it moving people into another bottomless money pit.
or “slop generators” can fail and deservedly should be cut.
, accusing the company of poor communication, lack of focus, and treating partners as expendable.
choices killed its economics.
and models, influencing future video tools even if the standalone app is gone.
Many replies demand Disney “just stop” and argue studio projects should be made by hand, urging a complete corporate retreat from generative AI.
Others push back: this isn’t the death of AI, it’s a shakeout, and generative tools will continue to exist and evolve regardless of one company’s moves.
Commenters argue reported figures are unreliable: the “$1M/day” claim is contested, “500K users” may include inactive or invite-only accounts, and headline losses don’t automatically prove failure.
Some allege shady strategies: claims that studios or platform owners bought, suppressed or misused models, and that leadership (e.g., OpenAI’s) acts out of greed or malfeasance.
Many point to other video generators (Google Veo, Grok, Chinese open-source options) and note Big Tech profitability differences as evidence this is an OpenAI problem, not an AI problem.
Strong emotional responses include calls for boycotts, piracy, and “scorched earth” tactics against studios that adopt AI, reflecting deep distrust and anger from parts of the audience.
Practical critiques focus on features and rollout: invite-only access, visible watermarks, costly pivots (e.g., to robotics), and the belief that companies prioritize dataset-building over delivering useful products.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
We hate AI
Disney really won’t give on implementing AI..
"Disney is now in talks with over a dozen companies to implement AI" just when I thought It could finally be over...
How about Disney realizes AI isn't the way to go and stops trying to make any of their content into ai
Every time you see ai slop say "Hollywood needs to watch out for this" Just know its click bait to make you made and interact to make studios think Ai might be worth investing in.
Let’s just pray those other AI endeavors fail horribly
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.