@unknown
@sama @narendramodi Bro came and became a meme😂 https://t.co/ec768OaPTy
Analysis of tweet about PM Modi meeting and AI in India: Codex weekly users surged 4x. Sentiment shows 51.92% supportive and 25.45% confronting reactions.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
Replies gush with national pride and excitement, celebrating Sam Altman’s meeting with PM Modi as a big signal that India is moving from consumer to creator at scale.
Many treat the spike in Codex weekly users as evidence of real developer pull, distribution unlocks, and product–market fit rather than a short-lived fad.
Commenters point to India’s massive, English‑proficient engineering pool, low legacy friction, and education pressures as fuel for rapid AI-native building and compounding growth.
People ask whether this surge will translate into long‑term enterprise adoption, local ecosystem builders, and whether compute, data centers, payments and latency will keep up.
Requests for free or cheaper Codex tiers, India‑specific infrastructure, and deeper local partnerships (Tata, Reliance) appear repeatedly as practical next steps.
Replies frame the moment as a geopolitical inflection — countries that accelerate AI adoption will gain economic leverage, and India could become a global training/innovation ground beyond Silicon Valley.
Many ask which sectors (EdTech, healthcare, enterprise vs indie) are driving adoption and whether Indian usage patterns will produce different product innovations.
While celebratory, some voices urge attention to ethics, equitable access, and policy alignment so rapid adoption benefits builders and broader society.
A torrent of users feel deeply betrayed by OpenAI’s sudden retirement of GPT-4o, with repeated pleas to #BringBack4o and explicit demands to open-source the model so workflows and trust can be restored.
Many accuse Sam Altman and the company of prioritizing growth numbers and investor-friendly PR over paying customers’ needs, calling the India visit a disposable photo-op that dodges accountability.
A persistent theme is that the newer models represent a tangible product regression—users claim losses in creative flow, instruction-following, and continuity that broke real-world workflows.
refunds, apologies, transparency about model retirements, and reinstating user choice (or open-sourcing 4o) appear across threads.
Replies raise geopolitical and competitive anxieties—concern that OpenAI’s market push in India will stifle local startups, while Anthropic, Grok and Claude are name-checked as alternatives.
The conversation mixes sharp anger and organized activism (#keep4o, #SaveGPT4o) with lighter content—memes mocking the awkward handshake and jokes about PR theater pepper the replies.
A significant portion of responses devolve into personal attacks, xenophobic sentiments, and violent rhetoric; these amplify the backlash but also complicate constructive dialogue.
users want their paid contracts and product expectations treated as priorities, not collateral for corporate optics.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
@sama @narendramodi Bro came and became a meme😂 https://t.co/ec768OaPTy
@sama @narendramodi And I’ve never once seen a single person say they like codex it just doesn’t happen. No one likes it. So just scrap it and give us back 4o. #keep4o
@sama @narendramodi Oh, so you're saying that Indian coders are your "all of humanity," but we're not? Is that what you mean? #keep4o
@sama @narendramodi The journey from hopelessness to hope was a long one.👍🇮🇳 https://t.co/85MLsHAF9P
@sama @narendramodi Great... #keep4o https://t.co/fnUd548NK3
@sama @narendramodi 4x in 2 weeks is not growth. that's a takeover. https://t.co/gjlKsGR6Zx