@Dr_Gingerballs
No AI models today can acquire or access knowledge. They are indexes of information. That’s all they are, and all they will ever be.
Tweet: AI shifts from info to knowledge, urging new form factors and executive layers. Reactions: 47.78% support, 32.78% confront. Calling for exec function.
This is the way. The past 50 years of computing was about inventing form factors to interact with information. Retrieve information. Search for information. Edit information. Save information. AI is about interacting with knowledge. It's completely different. Agents and models are there to do the dirty work aka interact with information). We need a new layer - more executive function, less tactical tools. So instead of trying to jam AI into old form factors, its time to imagine a new form factor. From scratch. From first principles. It's probably not a phone tbh, but what it is, I have not a clue. That said, like most breakthroughs we'll know it when we see it though. Good luck to the teams building this.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
systems that act on your behalf, not just show information.
not just a redesigned phone.
give incumbents massive advantages; models alone aren’t enough.
controls access to your knowledge, tools, identity, and permissions.
are needed for scale and latency reasons.
(think Apple-level trust) will shape adoption.
, and services will expose their own agents — the phone becomes an agent forum, not a single assistant.
are required to manage agent hallucinations and to “manage the managers.”
, proving the model beyond theory.
new metaphors for delegation, memory, and trusted execution.
many replies argue the same capabilities can be delivered via automation and smarter front‑ends on existing phones, so building a special “agentic” slab is unnecessary.
network effects like iMessage, the App Store, and tight cloud integration make users unlikely to abandon iPhones for a new vendor’s device.
widespread skepticism about Sam Altman/OpenAI running people’s phones, managing supply chains, or being granted control of sensitive personal data.
critics say models are indexers that hallucinate, aren’t true knowledge sources, and shouldn’t be the backbone of a phone OS.
many warned an AI phone would magnify surveillance and corporate data extraction, renewing concerns about losing control over personal information.
a recurring view: disruption should come from software and interaction design, not building phones; OpenAI lacks hardware credentials and should innovate UI/UX instead.
skeptics note people primarily use phones for social and media consumption, so an agent‑centric OS won’t meaningfully change everyday behavior.
a minority think the form factor is fine but want a device‑agnostic “AI OS” that abstracts apps and offers seamless voice wake words on existing phones.
a subset framed the idea as a psyop, financial trap, or existential threat, mixing distrust with apocalyptic or conspiratorial language.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
No AI models today can acquire or access knowledge. They are indexes of information. That’s all they are, and all they will ever be.
I have an honest question for you Chamath—is there any scenario where a market leader in a cutting edge field announces a new initiative and you are not extremely bullish on it?
Or. If it’s not broke. Don’t fix it. I’m waiting for the form factor of make it faster, make it reliable. I don’t need more options.
about interacting with knowledge... not just consuming it the winner isn't whoever builds the new AI phone it's whoever owns the agent layer on top the orchestration layer between you and everything your knowledge, tools, apps... hardware doesn't matter when the intellig
"Phone" has long stopped being a meaningful description of the computer you carry in your pocket. Phoning other people is just one small thing that some people sometimes do with this computer. So it's a phoney name!
Where I would love to get a new phone system... I will not ever trust openai I.e Sam Altman. Is the epitome of a bond villain?
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.