K
@KimGeorgeton
No. I asked her what studies have been done on the VR headsets they use in classrooms. NONE. Let me make this clear. WE DO NOT EXPERIMENT ON OUR CHILDREN.
135
9
2.5K
@ShadowofEzraposted on X
Byron Daniels’ wife, Erika Donalds, says young children in public schools should be surrounded by artificial intelligence instead of human teaching assistants. She says AI assistants should be placed in every single classroom and will “empower everyone.” “This gives them 12 teaching assistants or more.”
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
87% Engaged
82% Negative
Positive
5%
Negative
82%
Neutral
13%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
political indoctrination
commenters argue AI would prevent “liberal” teachers from pushing protests, ideology or grooming children.
2
objective, accurate information
rather than the biased or “indoctrinated” lessons they associate with public schools and college-trained teachers.
3
android or AI would be more competent and trustworthy
than current staff, using derogatory language to emphasize frustration.
4
condoning removal of safeguards
(one reply explicitly supports teachers having sexual relationships with students), revealing an extreme rejection of existing norms.
Opposing
1
Children need human interaction:
Many replies insist classrooms are for social growth, play, creativity and emotional development — not more screens.
2
AI will replace teachers and cut jobs:
Critics say AI assistants are a cost-saving substitute that will eliminate teaching positions and weaken school support systems.
3
AI as propaganda/indoctrination:
A common thread warns unchecked algorithms become digital propaganda that can push curated narratives and suppress independent thought.
4
Safety and experimentation concerns:
Several voices object to VR headsets and untested tech in classrooms, arguing “we do not experiment on our children”.
5
Practical limits — discipline and special needs:
Commenters doubt AI can manage disruptive behavior or meet the needs of special-needs students the way humans do.
6
Technical vulnerabilities — GIGO and malicious code:
Users point to “garbage in, garbage out,” shielding against hidden backdoors, and the risk of subverted or biased training data.
7
Profit and conflict-of-interest suspicions:
Many suspect politicians or vendors stand to gain financially, urging scrutiny of who benefits from deploying AI in schools.
8
Political framing — replace “woke” teachers or push agendas:
Some see AI as a partisan tool to remove certain teachers or rewrite curricula to fit ideological goals.
9
Action response — homeschool or opt out:
A large cohort urges parents to homeschool or withdraw children from public schools rather than accept AI-driven instruction.
10
Conspiracy and alarmist narratives:
Replies include fears of MKUltra, transhumanism, globalist control and apocalyptic outcomes tied to classroom AI.
11
Abusive and bigoted attacks:
A significant number of replies devolve into personal insults, racist and antisemitic accusations aimed at public figures rather than substantive policy critique.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
D
@Dragonflynda
Please lock these people away from our children.
66
2
630
H
@hippyresident
Homeschool your kids!
60
1
371
D
@ddgalinca
Id rather have my kid around AI than mentally ill Libtards trying to groom my child!
11
11
763
P
@PhilipMSoeder
Erika & Byron seem legit. 😉
3
0
88
C
@christ_is_kingq
If it eventually ends teachers sleeping with students then I’m all for it. No more teachers teaching their opinion on things using their indoctrinated college education… The future…
0
0
350
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.