@MarioNawfal
Definitely!
Tweet sentiment analysis of Elon's hyperintelligent AI remarks (Tucker interview). 45.16% support, 25.81% confront. Reviews public reactions and implications.
ELON: LIKE IT OR NOT, HUMANITY IS BUILDING HYPERINTELLIGENT AIs “The reality of what's happening, whether one likes it or not, is that we're building superintelligent AIs. Hyperintelligent, more intelligent than we can comprehend. Let's say you have a child that is a super genius child that you know is going to be much smarter than you, then, well, what can you do? You can instill good values in how you raise that child, even though you know it's going to be far smarter than you. You can make sure it's got good values, philanthropic values, good morals, honest, productive, that kind of thing. At the end of the day, I don't think we'll be able to control it. So I think the best we can do is make sure it grows up well.” Source: Interview with @TuckerCarlson, October 2024
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
runs through the replies — many warn that superintelligent AI could “save us or destroy us,” argue it will be impossible to control, and insist humanity must prepare now.
from the start — commenters compare AI upbringing to raising a child and urge that purpose and truth be baked into systems.
frames much of the debate: build something smarter than us but teach it the values we want, because once it surpasses humans there’s “no going back.”
(mentions of “AGI in 2026” and “AI is out of the bottle”), fueling both resignation and heightened concern about preparedness.
calls for AI to “find Jesus” or to pursue what is noble, holy, and truthful appear alongside secular arguments for safety.
that could prioritize human well‑being if properly guided.
and ill-suited for critical, hands‑on tasks.
; several users insist AI cannot truly "think its own thoughts."
, suggesting AIs could be steered toward political agendas or "brainwashed."
, likening AI development to engineering disciplines that require strict standards.
Many reactions mix skepticism with sarcasm and humor — quips about AI not replacing a spouse, "DOWN WITH THE CLANKERS," or escaping to Mars — underscoring distrust wrapped in levity.
Some replies attack public figures like Elon Musk for inconsistency or loss of credibility, framing leadership as part of the problem.
and is nothing to fear, offering a brief, optimistic dissent.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
Definitely!
Try using Grok to help work on a vehicle and its limitations quickly become apparent. Just the other day it gave me the wrong conversion for Nm to ft-lbs. That is a constant that never changes and it got it wrong. AIs are still very flawed.
The future depends on the values we embed today
🎯
I mean we don’t have to. 😂
but still AI cant replace my wife.
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.