AI
AI Analysis
Live Data

Grok Tops Open Router LLM Leaderboard Amid High Support

Analysis: Tweet about Grok's #1 ranking shows 69% supportive sentiment and 10% confronting. Highlights leadership in programming and Open Router standings.

Community Sentiment Analysis

Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement

Sentiment Distribution

79% Engaged
69% Positive
Positive
69%
Negative
10%
Neutral
21%

Critical Perspectives

Community concerns and opposing viewpoints

1

Criticism dominates

Many replies dismiss Grok’s performance — short takes like “BS,” “don’t enjoy Grok for coding,” and complaints about poor results recur throughout.

2

Popularity tied to price, not quality

Multiple users say Grok is used because it’s free, not because it’s better (“Because it is free. No other reason.”).

3

Competitors preferred

Repeated comparisons favor Gemini and Codex — users claim Gemini gives better answers and Codex holds context more reliably.

4

Inconsistency and context issues

Several tweets question Grok’s ability to keep context, agree internally, or produce consistent outputs (“grok doesn’t even agree,” “grok dont play fair”).

5

Hype backlash

A strain of irritation at over-promotion appears — calls to “stop over hyping” and dismissive reactions like “No one cares” and clown emojis.

6

Some defenses, but disputed

A few cite a tournament where Grok won, yet others immediately question the data’s authenticity and relevance.

7

Off-topic banter and cultural snippets

The thread includes jokes, astrology/exoplanet quips, anime asks, and a German note about image generation limits — mixing critiques with playful replies.

F

@FaultyButton

I have not enjoyed Grok for coding

3
1
1
18
W

@Web3__Youth

grok dont play fair, smh

3
3
0
78
T

@toonytoons

access ≠ efficacy

2
1
0
246

Supporting Voices

Community members who agree with this perspective

1

Triumphant celebration

Replies are full of cheers, emojis and congratulations — many users call Grok “#1,” “dominating,” and “absolute domination,” celebrating a perceived upset of established models.

2

Coding credibility

Builders emphasize that the programming leaderboard is what matters, with comments like “time to update our API keys” and praise for Grok’s precision in coding tasks.

3

Momentum and adoption

Numerous replies point to fast iteration and real-world usage as the driver — users say adoption is accelerating and that sustained performance, not marketing, is shifting the hierarchy.

4

Open-competition narrative

Many frame this as a win for open models and competitive innovation, framing Grok’s rise as a challenge to Google/OpenAI and a market-driven verdict.

5

Performance vs. guardrails

Several voices note the trade-offs — some credit raw performance to fewer safety filters, while others acknowledge Grok still makes mistakes and needs refinement.

6

Practical impact and creativity

Respondents highlight real use cases — music videos, research, productivity gains, even rocket-trajectory ideas — portraying Grok as useful beyond demos.

7

Big expectations and future bets

A number of replies project bullish futures (Grok 5/6, new benchmarks like .faf) and urge standards or new metrics to cement the momentum.

X

@XCEO_eth

Winning.

29
13
10
358
C

@carolletta

Love 🤍 @grok

11
4
1
437
M

@Mr_medic

Yes ofcourse Don’t google it Grok it

7
2
0
997