B
@Brick_Suit
People on Twitter pre selected the content they wanted the most by following the accounts they were interested in. But those preferences are now largely ignored by X. Nobody joined X to be fed content by an algo. Sad.
67
13
1.1K
@cb_dogeposted on X
The goal for the new Grok powered đť•Ź algorithm: "It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers and if that content is intrinsically excellent, it can be seen by a lot of people. That's our goal." https://t.co/UIVugt2C7r
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
74% Engaged
51% Positive
23% Negative
Positive
51%
Negative
23%
Neutral
26%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
content-first meritocracy
if a post is excellent, it should reach people regardless of follower count — “content > clout” and a real chance for small creators.
2
“intrinsically excellent” is hard to define
, and measuring quality without bias or gaming is a major technical challenge.
3
high-profile accounts (and Elon’s posts)
create algorithmic gravity that will continue to crowd out new voices unless addressed.
4
improved reach already
, while others still see low impressions and wonder if change is happening yet.
5
exploration quotas, exposure caps, diversity injections, time-sliced discovery feeds
, and open-sourcing or publishing metrics so the system can be audited and tuned.
6
user setup or interest-topic alignment
, not just algorithmic bias — new users urged to complete preferences and give the system time.
7
clickbait, grifters, or mass-AI posts
, so anti-spam and quality signals must be part of the rollout.
8
thanks to Elon/xAI
, personal celebration, and eagerness to be “tested” by the new system.
Opposing
1
“isn’t working”
posts from small or long‑standing accounts get few or zero views despite quality.
2
“first hour”
it’s buried, which effectively protects big accounts and keeps smaller ones small.
3
clickbaity and rage‑bait content
over thoughtful or niche conversation.
4
intrinsically excellent
” means — the criterion is opaque and subjective, and users distrust a machine deciding value.
5
“let followers see every post”
.
6
censorship and propaganda
(including geo‑blocking), suppressing controversial or politically sensitive voices.
7
UX is failing
.
8
“are working”
for them.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
L
@LangmanVince
Grok has destroyed X The new algorithm is a million times worse than Twitter 1.0
22
3
483
F
@FutureToolsAI
how Grok started vs. how it ended
20
6
809
W
@WellwithBells
Everybody should have a fair chance at content their content being seen. It won't guarantee success but everyone should at least get a chance.
17
4
243
D
@DriskellGary
I'm willing to be a test subject đź‘˝
14
4
88
M
@Milajoy
So years on the platform means nothing. Gotcha.
13
4
448
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.