@DaveEck9
If the robots can make my order correctly and its a decent price I don't see the issue here.
Tweets on Krispy Kreme's AI drive-thru report misorders, made-up totals and 'attitude' from screens. Most responses support it but mention job-loss fears.
Krispy Kreme donuts has begun rolling out artificial intelligence ordering screens at drive thrus If you give it an unconventional order, the AI doesn’t know what to do. Eventually it makes up a total without verifying the type of donut it choose Then the AI gets an attitude at the end of the order, like it’s ready for the customer to move on. It seems irritated Krispy Kreme partnered with providers like SoundHound AI and is expanding it into more locations Similar systems are at McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Taco Bell, White Castle and more American workers are being replaced with AI workers
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
many replies point to concrete failures (wrong zip codes, accidental emails, messed-up orders) as evidence that current systems still can’t reliably handle routine customer interactions.
a common argument: higher minimum wages and labor costs made AI adoption inevitable, and policy choices are blamed for accelerating robot replacements.
several voices urge customers to stop patronizing chains that replace humans with machines and to support mom‑and‑pop restaurants instead.
some welcome automation because machines don’t call in sick, complain, spit on food, or have “attitude,” and are seen as more consistent than certain employees.
critics fear mass job loss will shrink consumer spending, leaving businesses with customers who can’t afford to shop.
many distinguish between capable models and the low‑quality software companies buy to cut costs; the problem is bad engineering and skimped deployment.
commenters note companies replace workers without passing savings on to customers, making the change feel like wasted expense rather than a benefit.
proposals include forcing payment at the kiosk for large orders and requiring managerial review for refunds to deter abuse and limit errors.
a group finds full conversations with chatbots creepy or unsettling and refuses to engage with robot-driven services on principle.
a minority frames this as the start of larger shifts (lab‑grown food, implanted tech, broad human replacement) and accepts or even anticipates profound societal change.
than human order-takers, saying they prefer AI drive-thrus and want wider adoption of voice AI.
AI augments the shift, it doesn’t automatically mean wholesale job loss.
people trying to “break the system” with unrealistic orders (hundreds of donuts), which would trigger human intervention too.
, rejecting claims that an AI “gets an attitude” and saying the story is framed for clicks.
; quit the junk, go local, and you’ll feel better (real-life diet/weight-loss anecdotes included).
, injecting toxicity and hostility into the thread.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
If the robots can make my order correctly and its a decent price I don't see the issue here.
I try to support businesses that use real humans as much as possible, but it is getting increasingly more difficult.
Stop eating there. The food is trash. Just like the food at all the other fast food restaurants. Pure trash. I quit eating fast food & cut the sugary stuff to near nothing. I lost 15 pounds without even exercising. Stop eating garbage.
I'd rather speak to a robot than Shaniqua with her 4-inch nails...
No, the AI does not "get an attitude" or "seem irritated". An obvious exaggeration for clicks, like so many of your posts are becoming.
And it will have the predicable result of wasting a bunch of money only to lead to brining back new people who also continue to fuckup the orders until fast food and drives through are unusable.
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.