S
@ScroogeCap
But but but... 1. They just raised 120B 2. CFO says month later they might not meet their spending commitments Some added layers there. But largely I agree - we needed an excuse for a small pullback.
10
0
1.7K
@jukan05posted on X
Those selling the stock after reading the WSJ article on OpenAI fall into two categories: 1.Those who had been looking for an excuse to sell and are using this as the opportunity; and 2.Those who are simply dumb enough to follow the mood. Why do you think Sam Altman declared “code red” last year? Obviously, it was because they were falling short of their targets. If turning something everyone already knew into a sensational story counts as a skill, then I guess that is a skill.
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
74% Engaged
60% Positive
Positive
60%
Negative
14%
Neutral
26%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
WSJ crystallized a sell-off
many replies say the article didn’t invent new facts but gave nervous holders “permission” to panic, so markets sold the headline and amplified an already fragile swing.
2
Reporting lacks credibility
critics point out anonymous sources, no numbers or OpenAI comment, and recycled rumors, calling the piece sensationalist rather than investigative.
3
Product and market share trump short-term misses
several voices argue that if OpenAI’s models and capacity win the race, temporary target misses won’t matter; customer adoption (Codex usage, Anthropic defections) is cited as proof.
4
Buy-the-dip mentality
a chunk of replies treat the pullback as a healthy correction and a buying opportunity (DCA or double‑down), blaming emotion for the drop rather than fundamentals.
5
Real risk and opacity concerns
others warn this could be more than noise: missed internal targets, massive recent fundraising, possible secondary-market illiquidity and lack of company commentary suggest structural risk worth watching.
6
Macro/sector dynamics at play
some see this as part of a broader cool-off in overheated semiconductor/AI “picks-and-shovels” stocks or poor timing (WSJ ahead of earnings), i.e., an excuse for rotation rather than an existential story about OpenAI.
Opposing
1
Secure profits at an all‑time high
take gains now rather than risk a pullback.
2
Markets already price information
; you can't pick when a fact is "baked in" and when it isn't.
3
Hypocrisy call
criticizing sensationalism while participating in the same platform undercuts the critique.
4
Skepticism about commercial value
OpenAI’s meaningful revenue is questioned and general models are seen as overrated.
5
Reckless leverage critique
dismissing new signals with "we already knew" while being fully leveraged is dangerous.
6
CFO warnings are material
concerns about meeting spending commitments should be treated as fresh, relevant information; good investors separate analysis from their book.
7
Leadership/trust risk
legal disputes (Elon vs. Sam) raise questions about governance and credibility.
8
Bullish catalyst flagged
some expect a revenue lift after the v5.5 release.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
T
@tuncerdeniz
And since the code red, OpenAI has been on fire. Our Codex usage has gone through the roof.
10
0
875
M
@MinervaCap
More likely that semiconductor and AI picks and shovels stocks have run super-hot non-stop since the Iran bottom and just needed an excuse to cool off. Possibly another Deepseek-type dip that will get bought up (but possibly after some sharp pain first)
7
2
1.3K
A
@AdriBorLyon
The CFO litterally just said she is concerned they won’t be able to meet spending commitments. That’s not old news my friend. You judge the quality of an investor by his/her ability to stay neutral in the news analysis vs their own book.
3
0
187
A
@AdriBorLyon
So your excuse is “we already knew so we have to ignore it?” lol. Wonder who’s the dumb one here. Fully levered at the high.
2
0
171
4
@455BAG
The stonks are at the ath, you think now is not a good time to secure profits?
1
0
307
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.