@dahi_kachorie
That's the potential Indian holds, he would have never started it if Elon didn't remove him from X, but now he will directly compete with top AI firms
Tweet: Parag Agarwal built an AI company worth ₹15,000 crore in two years. Sentiment analysis shows ~67% supportive, ~20% confronting — public reaction summary.
🚨 Indian-origin Parag Agarwal, who was removed as Twitter CEO, built an AI company worth ₹15,000 crore in 2 years. https://t.co/lvGGsE9w6G
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
Many celebrate the narrative that getting removed from Twitter turned into a rapid rebound — a near–instant comeback that produced a multibillion-dollar startup within ~24 months.
Replies frame this as a national win — IIT credentials, Olympiad pedigree and global leadership are cited as evidence that Indian engineers and leaders scale world-class products.
A large slice of replies focus on the tech — Parallel Web is described as a web index built for AI agents that strips human UI friction, effectively a “Google for bots” that enables agentic workflows.
Several voices position Parallel Web as poised to challenge Grok and top AI firms, turning the comeback into a high-stakes market rivalry with Elon-linked projects.
Commenters argue that prior leadership at Twitter gives him scale, systems knowledge and networks that make building and fundraising far easier than starting cold.
Some note that the reported ~₹15,000 crore / $2B figure is funding-driven, not profit-driven, a reminder that investor pricing doesn’t equal revenue or earnings.
A few replies stress that Silicon Valley’s capital, talent pool and risk culture are central to rapid scaling — the same idea framed as why US ecosystems accelerate deep‑tech startups.
many replies blame Parag for biased moderation, praise Elon for “saving” the platform, and express disbelief that he could attract $100M after that record.
investors were “fooled,” this is bubble behavior like the dotcom era, and most new AI startups aren’t worth sky-high metrics.
critics insist he hasn’t done anything for India, the company is US‑registered, and accuse Indians abroad of contributing to a brain drain instead of building domestic alternatives.
several replies predict any AI he builds will replicate Twitter’s alleged political bias, making the product unacceptable to some users.
a strand of replies attack his competence or clarity about the product, calling him unclear about what he’s building.
skeptics expect the venture won’t stay independent (either sold to another American company or absorbed by figures like Elon) rather than becoming a durable, original success.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
That's the potential Indian holds, he would have never started it if Elon didn't remove him from X, but now he will directly compete with top AI firms
Reason why is was CEO of Twitter , Already well known man will not have to work hard to build any company or brand from scratch as they already knows how it scale things faster than anybody building from scratch first time.
Parag destroyed Twitter with his woke nonsense and censorship. Elon saved it and made it X. Now this guy raises $100M?
FYI, He is building a dedicated infrastructure tool called Parallel Web, which argues that the current web is designed for humans and it is messy for AI agents The startup Aims for a system which removes the designs which is enabled for humans like clicks, buttons etc
Everyone will build some bullshit AI company and then have sky high valuation based on some bullshit metrics. You think apart from GPT, Claude, Gemini and few others none are worth anything. Like dotcom bubble, the AI bubble will burst.
Another brain drain follower. Shame on Indians in the US, UK, Australia, etc. Did nothing for the country.
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.