D
@DavidSZD1
Qwen 3.5 https://t.co/lhLjCUEsYP
3
0
508
@testingcatalogposted on X
Sonar 2 is now available on Perplexity web 👀 > Sonar models are Perplexity’s in‑house LLMs, optimized specifically for fast, web‑grounded search and answering Which base do you think was used for Sonar 2? DeepSeek V4, Kimi K2.6, or Qwen? https://t.co/5UQZz5Dxzu
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
50% Engaged
40% Negative
Positive
10%
Negative
40%
Neutral
50%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
Paste the tweet replies or a direct link to them — I can’t fetch Twitter from here
Provide the replies (one per line or a screenshot OCR), or tell me how many replies to sample, and I’ll extract each distinct viewpoint into concise numbered points with the key phrase highlighted.
Opposing
1
Model identifier cited:
a terse mention of "Qwen 3.5 397" — shorthand emphasis on the release/version.
2
Size/impact downplayed:
speculation that it’s "most probably something small," suggesting low expectations for significance.
3
Negative early evaluation:
"it's still quite shit from initial testing" — early testers reporting poor performance.
4
Resource/share/attention:
a post linking to "Qwen 3.5" (received the most likes), signaling interest or promotion despite mixed reactions.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
H
@humphreyCSGO
its still quite shit from innitial testing
1
0
444
P
@PietroMontaldo
Interesting… I’d bet on DeepSeek V4
0
0
404
A
@arsen_fa
qwen 3.5 397
0
0
384
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.