C
@carlmarxpmt
fighting fake demons; no one listens to this slop anymore lmao
92
0
1.7K
@TheChiefNerdposted on X
SACKS: “We're really lucky that [Trump] is President … when this AI revolution is happening.” JASON: “What would happen if Kamala ‘Ding Dong’ was in right now?” SACKS: “We'd have no data centers, they'd be using AI to censor us, and they'd be promoting DEI values through AI.” https://t.co/G536UswlqK
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
80% Engaged
28% Positive
52% Negative
Positive
28%
Negative
52%
Neutral
20%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
Trump built the AI backbone
many replies credit the current administration with delivering the data centers, power and pipelines that make large-scale AI possible — “a huge win” for advancing the technology.
2
Democrats = censorship + CCP risk
a recurring view is that a Democratic victory would have handed control to forces (including alleged ties to the CCP) that would censor speech, shut down platforms like X and stifle American freedom.
3
Woke AI and DEI enforcement
respondents warn AI will be deliberately used to push DEI agendas — not to enhance capability — and that institutions will “force” woke models across higher ed, corporations and government.
4
Bias and censorship are happening now
multiple replies assert mainstream models (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.) are already left-leaning and actively censor certain viewpoints or content categories.
5
Infrastructure is a double‑edged sword
several commenters concede that building massive data centers and networks accelerates AI but also creates the means for future regimes to censor or control information.
6
Silicon Valley and billionaire influence
threads note that tech donors and billionaires benefited from the current alignment, urging they keep funding midterms if they want to preserve the status quo.
7
Pragmatic agreement across divides
some voices admit they dislike Trump’s other actions yet still back the choice that preserved AI infrastructure — “I despise him, but I agree with Sacks.”
8
Liberty-first AI argument
a principled minority argues the AI revolution should expand human potential and protect sovereignty of thought, not automate censorship or quota systems.
Opposing
1
Tech elites are driving AI and data-center buildouts for profit and power
many replies argue Big Tech will expand infrastructure regardless of which party is in office, because “it’s about securing and keeping money in the same hands.”
2
Data centers and AI equal surveillance and censorship
a large group fears these systems will be used to monitor, control and silence people, linking data centers to authoritarian outcomes like digital IDs and CBDCs.
3
Both parties are the same elite project
commenters say “red/blue theatrics” mask a Uniparty that serves oligarchic interests, so switching presidents won’t change the trajectory of AI deployment.
4
AI threatens jobs and livelihoods
many worry workers will be displaced, layoffs will accelerate, and elites will push schemes like UBI while profiting from automation.
5
Deep distrust of named pundits and tech figures
several replies attack credibility and motives of hosts and guests (e.g., David Sacks and “tech bros”), calling their warnings self-serving or hypocritical.
6
Geopolitical and militarized consequences
some fear AI and data infrastructure will enable greater foreign entanglement, wars, and regional power shifts (mentions of Israel, Iran and war escalation).
7
Mockery and dismissal of the conversation as propaganda
a big chunk of responses treat the original claims as “slop,” “fake,” or laughably out of touch, insisting the debate is performative.
8
Logical and technical skepticism
several reply that the argument makes no sense (e.g., “how would AI censor us without data centers?”), or downplay AI as “just scrapers” rather than some new omnipotent force.
9
Class-based critique and calls for systemic change
a minority frame the issue as plutocrats vs. working people, urging worker control over production and decarbonization of the ultra-rich.
10
Culture-war and identity critiques as distraction
commenters argue elites weaponize DEI and culture-war rhetoric to manufacture consent and divert attention from economic capture.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
J
@JJTegland
Of course they ARE going to use AI to censor us. They WILL be using AI to push DEI. The left is riding the pendulum, watching everyone build the axe they'll be swinging. Bookmark this.
19
1
1.3K
M
@MondoARG
They are using AI to censor us now.
15
2
917
0
@0xNotSteve
China would be eating us for lunch if Kamala won. That’s what would have happened. We dodged an RPG. Pray for 2028.
14
3
491
S
@soundlogist
Sacks did nothing in his time as the Crypto Czar. He’s so full of shit..the energy that power these data centers are more expensive bc of his dumb ass president.
14
0
351
M
@MantoothTy
Conservatives celebrating that they’re going to be put out of work, lives destroyed, and end up being killed by their own government. Ppl, you think they’re going to pay us not to work or lose money just to help out American workers?
13
2
510
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.