@DuaneStorey
Opus 4.7 won't even do medical research for me anymore, I always get some usage policy exemption, even when I ask it to go read public PDFs on the web. It's mostly useless for me now. I switched to Codex about a week ago.
71% support vs 12% confront: tweet shows users prefer ChatGPT. Many say Claude needs extra clicks to finish tasks, souring trust in Anthropic and users' workflows.
I regularly run ChatGPT and Claude side-by side. ChatGPT gets the same task done, while Claude just doesn't... I am souring on Anthropic based on my recent experiences What is the point of an AI tool if I have to manually click 3-4x to have it complete my task... https://t.co/yXUk8A4ErL
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
users report it’s become slower, times out mid-task, suffers context rot and “refusal” loops, and performs worse than it did a month ago or in earlier Opus releases.
the model hitting a “tool-use ceiling” or session limit mid-task causes repeated restarts, wasted tokens and hidden costs — many call it effectively looting users.
if a model needs babysitting or multiple clicks to finish, it’s useless for work. People are switching to ChatGPT / Codex / OpenCode because they reliably finish one-shot tasks and save time.
one hypothesis is Opus 4.7 was trained on session-max data, teaching the model to overuse tools, load extra skills and defer work — and that behavior now clashes with Anthropic’s harness limits.
Claude (and newer Opus versions) can excel in long, agentic loops and complex multi-step PRs, while GPT variants win on throughput and single-shot execution; mixing models in a stack is a common recommendation.
many feel Anthropic has prioritized B2B features and safety at the cost of the consumer experience — poor support, strict identity checks and neglected consumer dashboards are recurring complaints.
users are switching models, routing tasks to the tool that “just works,” or using CLI flags (e.g. --dangerously-skip-permissions) to avoid stoppages — the pragmatic takeaway: pick reliability over headline capability.
some predict Anthropic (with Google's Gemini looming) will soon be the best LLM.
reports of millions uninstalling ChatGPT and Claude hitting #1 on the App Store are cited as proof of changing market preference.
Claude’s extra clicks and tool limits are framed as deliberate design choices to reduce risky outputs.
many non-coders praise Claude as “smarter,” while some developers report opposite experiences, revealing a perception gap.
frequent retries often signal poor framing of the task rather than an inherent model failure.
ChatGPT often returns a full (sometimes hallucinated) solution in one pass; Claude stops to avoid hallucination and relies on tools, which can require extra user interaction.
defenders call the extra steps benign or even “character building,” while critics accuse complainers of laziness.
developers report using one model as a coding engine (Codex/ChatGPT) and Claude for code review or tooling integrations.
most claims are presented as personal experience rather than systematic comparison, so opinions remain mixed.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
Opus 4.7 won't even do medical research for me anymore, I always get some usage policy exemption, even when I ask it to go read public PDFs on the web. It's mostly useless for me now. I switched to Codex about a week ago.
The consumer experience is not even bad, it is totally non-existent. I am sure no one even looks at the consumer app dashboards internally, they are printing so much money on enterprise. They are truly a B2B SaaS company.
Wait til they take your $200 and THEN ask for 2 forms of government ID or you can't use the services you already paid for @bcherny @_catwu how do I get my $200 back? I'm moving exclusively to Codex
codex is my daily driver, and I'll have claude code do a review on my PR, adding comments using 'gh'
Honestly this sounds less like “Claude vs ChatGPT” and more like a prompting/workflow issue. If you need 3–4 retries, the task probably isn’t being framed clearly enough for either model to nail it first pass.
web interface
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.