@unknown
@antonioguterres This is your real image made by AI! But it’s still your real image. https://t.co/4RBZwnx8DR
UNGA appoints an independent AI scientific panel. Sentiment: confronting 76.51%, support 9.61%. Signals debate over equity, oversight and capacity globally.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
Many replies praise António Guterres and the UN initiative as a historic, needed step, with users thanking him and celebrating the panel’s launch.
There is a strong call for global AI governance and safety standards, stressing independent scientific guidance to keep AI development equitable and accountable rather than driven solely by big tech.
commentators warn that computing and expertise are concentrated in a few countries and firms, risking a lasting technological divide for developing nations.
Several posts highlight the panel’s geographic and gender diversity and its personal-capacity membership as crucial to resisting political or corporate capture and protecting cultural and social rights.
Many voices frame AI as a tool to augment human expertise, urging adoption with responsible oversight rather than treating it as an existential threat.
A subset of replies emphasizes sovereign, decentralized expertise — citing South Africa and calls for capacity-building — to ensure all countries can engage on equal footing.
Scattered responses include supportive links, emojis, and short affirmations, reinforcing wide public enthusiasm and backing for the initiative.
Replies repeatedly charge António Guterres and the UN with supporting or legitimizing the Iranian regime—many accuse them of being "terrorist supporters," having "blood on their hands," and demand apologies, disinvitations and accountability. Calls for resignation and denunciations of moral cowardice are frequent.
A large number of tweets label the organization "useless," "corrupt" or "dangerous," urging defunding, structural overhaul, or outright abolition. Financial and institutional distrust is a recurring theme.
Many respondents argue that talking about AI or convening panels is irrelevant or offensive while mass killings and human-rights abuses are unfolding—this is framed as misplaced focus and diplomatic complacency.
The UN is mocked as an antiquated, ineffective bureaucracy unable to address exponential technological change or urgent crises; users question the organization's capacity to act rather than merely speak.
Hashtags like #IranMassacre, #FreeIran and calls to disinvite Iranian officials show coordinated activist demands for concrete steps, sanctions, and international scrutiny rather than diplomatic niceties.
Replies contain extensive insults, crude language, and violent rhetoric directed at Guterres and the UN; such abuse underlines the intensity and personal nature of the backlash.
A smaller subset questions whether countries can engage on "equal footing" in AI, jokes about AI replacing officials, or alleges bribery/NGO manipulation; a few tweets raise tangential or conspiratorial claims.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
@antonioguterres This is your real image made by AI! But it’s still your real image. https://t.co/4RBZwnx8DR
@antonioguterres You are a Terrorist! https://t.co/PyocnjYcmv
@antonioguterres usless organization . terrorism suporter https://t.co/ZigpF6jHxQ
@antonioguterres https://t.co/DrDeZWnQci
@antonioguterres https://t.co/aLmfJc43RO
@antonioguterres https://t.co/tIhAYGerrA