@SalerinOfSpades
@Variety https://t.co/Rto3gkNI0A
First look at Val Kilmer digitally resurrected for 'As Deep as the Grave.' Trailer releases with family support and largely confrontational public reactions.
EXCLUSIVE: Val Kilmer has been resurrected by AI to star in the new movie "As Deep as the Grave." Here's a first look at the film's trailer. Kilmer's digital return has the support of his daughter, Mercedes, who previously told Variety: "He always looked at emerging technologies with optimism as a tool to expand the possibilities of storytelling. This spirit is something that we are all honoring within this specific film, of which he was an integral part.” Watch the trailer here: https://t.co/8JNmVVM5cp
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
Many argue this is the loved ones’ call — his daughter endorsed it and he’d expressed curiosity about tech, so using AI feels like honoring his intent.
Fans celebrate AI as a way to keep a legend “alive” on screen, viewing this as a heartfelt extension of his work and legacy.
Recreating Kilmer is framed as practical — it compensates the family and can provide for loved ones after his death.
Commenters expect more AI resurrections and digital doubles as studios lean on technology rather than creating fresh stars.
Others fear AI will replace actors, writers and crews, and resent studios using tech to cut human roles.
Several replies stress the need for proper likeness deals, SAG guidelines and explicit permissions to make this acceptable.
Some praise Kilmer’s realism while calling the rest of the trailer “AI slop” — applause for the technique but concern about inconsistent quality.
People point out that objections to “AI” vanish when the same outcome is labeled CGI or VFX, accusing critics of a double standard.
A portion of replies find the resurrection creepy or emotionally ambivalent, even if they accept the legal and financial rationale.
many replies call this act creepy, “ghoulish” and a desecration of the dead—a mechanized resurrection that people find deeply unsettling and dehumanizing.
a large strand accuses the estate/daughter of selling his likeness for money, framing the decision as profit-driven exploitation rather than an artistic choice.
critics argue family approval isn’t the same as the actor’s consent—if Kilmer didn’t sign off while alive, using his likeness is ethically dubious.
many worry studios will prefer cheap AI over hiring real performers, starving new actors of roles and eroding acting as a living art form.
consistent complaints that the trailer looks like AI slop / uncanny valley—voices sound wrong, facial work is unconvincing, and the result reads as a high‑res ghost, not a performance.
a large number of replies urge a consumer response—don’t watch, don’t pay—as the primary way to resist normalization of this practice.
a minority concede a legitimate use case—completing footage already shot or preserving continuity—but reject wholesale posthumous casting for new roles.
people fear this sets a precedent where studios and estates can own and monetize likenesses forever, transforming bodies of work into perpetual, corporately controlled assets.
beyond ethics and jobs, many find it personally traumatic—blurs the line between life and death and robs audiences of the human connection that an actual actor brings.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
@Variety https://t.co/Rto3gkNI0A
THIS IS CREEPY AF...and it's also sad that they are allowing this
I genuinely want this movie to fail hard.
Disgusting necromancy
Hollywood can't create new stars, so expect more of this, dead stars being resurrected with Ai
If they have permission from the family it's the loved ones' call. 🙂
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.