P
@PoorestG
You literally post political rage bait all day and night, every day and night.
281
4
5
4.4K
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
76% Engaged
59% Positive
17% Negative
Positive
59%
Negative
17%
Neutral
24%
Critical Perspectives
Community concerns and opposing viewpoints
1
Users feel the timeline is being taken apart and repackaged into labeled tabs instead of just showing people they follow — many demand "show me the people I follow" and a simpler, follow-first experience
Users feel the timeline is being taken apart and repackaged into labeled tabs instead of just showing people they follow — many demand "show me the people I follow" and a simpler, follow-first experience.
2
A large number of replies accuse the new system of promoting “political ragebait” and show distrust about perceived moderation bias (claims that some political content is being throttled while other content is amplified)
A large number of replies accuse the new system of promoting “political ragebait” and show distrust about perceived moderation bias (claims that some political content is being throttled while other content is amplified).
3
People want control
repeated requests for options to filter or block AI-generated content, toggle recommendation types, or return to chronological/explicit-follow feeds.
4
UX criticism is loud — descriptors like “over‑engineered,” “too many tabs,” and “the best button is no button” underline a preference for a smoother, less segmented interface
UX criticism is loud — descriptors like “over‑engineered,” “too many tabs,” and “the best button is no button” underline a preference for a smoother, less segmented interface.
5
Concerns about manipulation by bots, paid boosts and large accounts appear repeatedly, with users warning that the changes will be “immediately subverted by spammers and big corporations
”
6
Several replies call for harder moderation measures — from suspending certain AI accounts to banning repeat offenders — framed both as safety and product‑quality fixes
Several replies call for harder moderation measures — from suspending certain AI accounts to banning repeat offenders — framed both as safety and product‑quality fixes.
7
There’s a strong thread of nostalgia and frustration
people ask to “make it work like 2015,” saying the platform felt more reliable and familiar before these algorithmic experiments.
8
The tone swings between sharp anger, sarcasm and profanity on one side and concrete feature requests on the other, mixing conspiracy/accusation with practical suggestions for feeds, filtering and bot mitigation
The tone swings between sharp anger, sarcasm and profanity on one side and concrete feature requests on the other, mixing conspiracy/accusation with practical suggestions for feeds, filtering and bot mitigation.
R
@ryancduff
Bro literally nobody asked for this. I just want my friends to see my posts and if they think it’s funny, show it to others. You’re trying too hard and it’s not working. Everything is worse.
256
15
34
17.0K
T
@TheBigDoink_
I want my for you page to be nothing but e girls posting selfies that I can turn bald and fat with grok
109
2
15
5.0K
Supporting Voices
Community members who agree with this perspective
1
Huge enthusiasm — many replies cheer the idea as a welcome change, calling topic-specific "For You" tabs a game-changer for focused discovery and praising xAI for trying to prioritize quality over engagement
Huge enthusiasm — many replies cheer the idea as a welcome change, calling topic-specific "For You" tabs a game-changer for focused discovery and praising xAI for trying to prioritize quality over engagement.
2
Strong demand to remove political “rage bait” — repeated requests for a “no politics” toggle or a separate tab that isolates political/viral outrage so technical and niche content can breathe
Strong demand to remove political “rage bait” — repeated requests for a “no politics” toggle or a separate tab that isolates political/viral outrage so technical and niche content can breathe.
3
Calls for user control and transparency — people want customizable filters, tag sliders, and clear signals explaining why a post appears (e
g. , “shown because you engaged with X topic/account/keyword”).
4
Creators hopeful about fairer discovery — many expect quality-ranked feeds to boost small experts and reduce reach for engagement-farmers, potentially restoring incentive to post substantive content
Creators hopeful about fairer discovery — many expect quality-ranked feeds to boost small experts and reduce reach for engagement-farmers, potentially restoring incentive to post substantive content.
5
Skepticism and worry about implementation — several replies ask how “quality” will be defined, point to past algorithm changes that hurt impressions, and request beta testing to verify gains
Skepticism and worry about implementation — several replies ask how “quality” will be defined, point to past algorithm changes that hurt impressions, and request beta testing to verify gains.
6
Feature suggestions and concrete requests — common asks include topic tabs (AI, memes, sports, finance, science, Space, manufacturing, doggo, memes, etc
), tag-based filters, the ability to prompt Grok to reshape feeds, and access to private lists for Grok summaries.
7
Technical design ideas — proposals for auto-curated follow lists, quality-weighted replies, novelty/diversity feed options, user-programmable tabs, and real-time feed edits (e
g. , “make it funnier”) surface repeatedly.
8
Practical hopes for better UX — replies emphasize that topic-first feeds would improve learning, reduce noise, and turn timelines into tools for study rather than addictive attention farms
Practical hopes for better UX — replies emphasize that topic-first feeds would improve learning, reduce noise, and turn timelines into tools for study rather than addictive attention farms.
9
Requests to protect creator visibility — users want starter packs or mechanisms so promising small accounts aren’t buried, plus options like “always show tweets from” specific accounts regardless of ranking
Requests to protect creator visibility — users want starter packs or mechanisms so promising small accounts aren’t buried, plus options like “always show tweets from” specific accounts regardless of ranking.
10
Lighthearted and niche reactions — alongside serious feedback there’s a flood of playful tab ideas (hotdogs, For You Doggo, Starship, Vine-style videos), showing both excitement and eagerness to tailor the experience to many communities
Lighthearted and niche reactions — alongside serious feedback there’s a flood of playful tab ideas (hotdogs, For You Doggo, Starship, Vine-style videos), showing both excitement and eagerness to tailor the experience to many communities.
C
@crackyflipside
How about a simple way to edit our algorithm preferences? I can just type in "show me less political crap" and it works.
98
0
3
5.5K
S
@shakoistsLog
DO YOU UNDERSTAND UNSUPERVISED LEARNING CMON YOU HAVE TO
52
2
7
8.8K
Y
@Yuchenj_UW
Let us prompt the algo.
35
0
2
2.1K