@AstroXBT
ok so you clearly have no idea what bloomberg is used for lol
Tweet analysis: 52.1% confront vs 28.6% support Anthropic targeting Bloomberg Terminal and major data platforms, showing disruption to enterprise data control.
my god. anthropic casually going after bloomberg terminal and every single data tracking provider under the sun đ bloomberg terminal charges $24K per seat this could affect major data platforms like DataDog, Google analytics, CRM dashboards and sooo much more Anthropic is building the control center for every single enterprise company unbelievable
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying â both sides
sexy dashboards donât matter if you donât own unique feeds or the network that produces them; UI is table stakes, data ownership and network effects are what defend value.
natural-language access (Claude/Anthropic) can replace many dashboard interactions, putting seat-based revenue (Bloomberg/enterprise BI) at risk.
connecting language prompts directly to files/apps can turn âdata engineer + two sprintsâ into an instant query, dramatically lowering time-to-insight.
any service built on openly available sources can be hollowed out; proprietary, hard-to-replicate data and physical networks retain value.
rate limits, consistency, and cost of scale mean AI layers may not fully substitute specialized analytics products yet; reliability and throughput still matter.
this is seen as more than a feature: a move toward a megaapp or enterprise operating layer that embeds itself across workflows.
some view this as existential: AI could wipe out data providers and make formerly viable startups hard to justify, shrinking entrepreneurial opportunities.
many replies cheer the disruption: demos look great, challengers to âunderpricedâ incumbents are welcome, and plenty of people are itching to adopt immediately.
an HTML file with dynamic values, trivial to recreate with Chart.js and auto-refresh; itâs a feature, not a market-data engine.
cleaned, aggregated pipelines and data licensing are what customers pay for, and those arenât solved by prettier UIs.
(chat, workflows, shared conventions), which is far harder to displace than a front-end.
Looker, Tableau, Metabase, Power BI and internal dashboards that primarily serve âsomeone needs a chartâ workflows are the obvious targets.
for smaller teams and new customers, not a wholesale replacement of Bloombergâs enterprise offerings.
AI-hype â claiming feature parity with the Terminal ignores decades of infrastructure, compliance, and commercial relationships.
areas that are expensive, regulated, and difficult to replicate.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
ok so you clearly have no idea what bloomberg is used for lol
My god, i didnt realize I could have just taken down Bloomberg terminal by putting Chart.js on a page and adding setTimeout(function() { location.reload(); }, 5000); to it. Unbelievable
Every week thereâs a supposed âBBG killerâ that is anything but
*built on top of all your proprietary data AND that of the enterprise customers :)
$24K per seat is a moat built on proprietary data pipelines, not the interface. The pipelines are still hard. But the charts, dashboards, and visualization layer is now table stakes.
al is $24K/seat/year - retool raised at $3.2B building exactly this layer and hit $120M ARR. What cowork adds is no-code dashboard creation from natural language connected directly to your files and apps, which compresses the "data engineer + two sprints" workflow to a p
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.