@OpenAIDevs
Want to try it yourself? Fork the open-source repo, connect your own tools, and build on top of it. https://t.co/fWlYmHTUh1
Learn how gpt-realtime-1.5 enables interactive voice-controlled apps so users manage app state naturally. Community reaction: ~60% supportive, ~14% confronting.
You can build interactive applications with gpt-realtime-1.5, so users can control app state more naturally with voice. Hi Chappy đ https://t.co/mh1O8ZBzIY
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying â both sides
users report dramatically faster task completion and far less contextâswitching; voice turns apps into a more natural, topâlayer interface rather than a set of forms and modals.
voice control is framed as a major assist for people with disabilities, older adults, and anyone multitasking or unable to use touch/keyboard.
the crucial shift is using voice to edit app state and execute precise UI actions (realâtime, contextual control) rather than returning text snippets or simple commands.
replies emphasize integrations (tool calling, Codex, persistent memory, approval workflows) and debate architectures (single model vs orchestrator/subagents).
latency, cursor behavior, instant mouse movement, systemâprompt organization, accents, noisy environments and low bandwidth are highlighted as real engineering challenges.
weekend projects, openâsource forks and demos (protein viewers, recruiting apps, home automation, SaaS voice layers) show strong community momentum and calls for wider realtime access.
visual design workflows, developer tools, games, scientific visualization, customer demos and accessibility features are all named as immediate winners for voice control.
enthusiasm is high (âChatGPT momentâ), but some joke about social/personal impacts (losing old conversational habits, âbedrotâ lifestyles) even as users celebrate the new interaction paradigm.
rather than delightful â a preference for clicky/physical controls or polished apps persists, so voice is seen as a complement, not a replacement.
, 4,096 output tokens and brittle bargeâin/VAD â make complex functionâcalling and agentic workflows impractical today.
get mangled, so models must be retrained for the new, rapidly evolving technical lexicon.
because itâs currently âprohibitively expensiveâ for production use.
for individuals.
(from poor filming/color grading to features that donât survive real deployments), and urge fewer hype cycles and more stable releases.
if not carefully controlled.
features and frustrations that the product appears to run on an âoutdatedâ model version (calls for GPT 5.6 / newer).
reflect resistance to systems that autonomously reorganize schedules or behavior.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
Want to try it yourself? Fork the open-source repo, connect your own tools, and build on top of it. https://t.co/fWlYmHTUh1
Integrating this into Codex and Computer Use would be sick. Real time steering.
gpt-realtime-2 wen ?
I tried this and itâs not good for people using it for technical things. For example: âswitch the model to Claude 4oâ gets interpreted as âclot four ohâ or something unusable. Youâve got to train on all the new language basins that have sprung up in the last 2 years!
wen in Codex?
Nf3, Nc6, d3 opening đ˘đ
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.