L
@Long725792857
クロードを試してみるのでしょうか？この記事を読んでいると、効率的で収益性の高い方法が分かるでしょう。
1
0
10
@heynavtoorposted on X
> hire a marketing agency for $5,000/month > wait 2 weeks for a report > get a PDF nobody reads > repeat every month > wonder where the budget went meanwhile: > build one sub-agent that writes the same report in 3 minutes > connect Claude to Gmail, Slack, Drive, and CRM in one afternoon > schedule daily briefings at 8am. nobody presses a button. > charge a client $5,000 once. saves them $3,000 every month. forever. > ask for 2 referrals. close both. 90 days in. $13,750/month. 5 clients. under $200 in tools. > most business owners tried Claude once, got a generic answer, and gave up. > they don't know sub-agents exist > they don't know what MCP servers are > they think AI is a chatbot that gap is your entire business. this article is the full 90-day playbook. read it now or compete against someone who did.
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
100% Engaged
92% Positive
Positive
92%
Negative
8%
Neutral
0%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
“Takes days, not hours”
builders report real integration work (error handling, permission scoping, client-specific logic) is non‑trivial; bill and budget for ongoing maintenance hours.
2
The value is packaging and go‑to‑market
several replies argue the opportunity isn’t just the tech but “knowing how to package and sell it”; “the gap is the whole business.”
3
Try Claude
multiple replies recommend using Claude to support clients efficiently and accelerate workflows.
4
DIY over agencies
some suggest replacing a $5,000/month agency with in‑house, efficient tooling to deliver continuous new value to clients.
5
Innovative and actionable
responders praise the approach as innovative and urge readers to read and act now to gain a competitive edge.
Opposing
1
Accountability-first skeptic:
Questions the claim’s credibility and demands clear answers on consequences — “what if it flops?” and especially “who pays?” — calling for guarantees, bonds, or legal liability before supporting the idea.
2
Pro-innovation defender:
Argues that bold claims require risk-taking; failures are part of progress and should be accepted so long as the experiment can advance learning and future success.
3
Pragmatic contingency advocate:
Pushes for concrete risk-management: pilot phases, escrowed funds or insurance, third‑party audits, and transparent rollback/refund plans so downside is contained and costs are allocated fairly.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
S
@SathishAiHype
The $13,750/month number is real. The "one afternoon" setup isn't. Connecting Claude to Gmail + Slack + CRM + Drive reliably with error handling, permission scoping, and client-specific logic takes days, not hours. The business model is solid.
0
0
85
A
@ArjunSlices
3min vs 2weeks checks out but setup isn't zero. Tried this for my SaaS workflows. Worth it once you price in maintenance hours#buildinpublic
0
0
56
R
@RbdBarbara
bold claim. what if it flops? who pays?
0
0
1
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.