PROMPTS
AI Analysis
Live Data

Tweet Sentiment: 85% Support for Video Prompt Guide

Tweet analysis of LLM video prompts: 84.6% supportive, 3.8% confronting. Shows prompt samples for character bibles, shot lists, camera direction and notes.

@GlitterPixelyposted on X

This is basically what it took to bring this video to life. Below are the prompts I used for character bible, shot list, camera direction, notes etc. Just copy and paste it into your favorite LLM and ask it to replace it with your character and world. 🌸 https://t.co/HHHSxf9A2b

View original tweet on X →

Community Sentiment Analysis

Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement

Sentiment Distribution

89% Engaged
85% Positive
Positive
85%
Negative
4%
Neutral
12%

Key Takeaways

What the community is saying — both sides

Supporting

1

Unfiltered praise

multiple replies gush with emojis and thanks: “perfect,” “just wow,” and heartfelt appreciation for the finished work.

2

Sharing the prompts is the real value

several commenters say the post’s worth comes from the exact prompts and shot lists: “ten times more valuable” and “the shot list gives it structure; the bible keeps it grounded.”

3

Demand for technical details and training

repeated questions: “What AI model was used?” and requests to “provide training” show people want the toolchain and how-to, not just the result.

4

Creative inspiration / replication

readers want to copy or riff on the workflow: suggestions like “gugu gaga doll unboxing,” “I’m totally going to do it,” and “perfect for Octo” signal immediate community adoption.

5

Surprise and disbelief that it’s AI-driven

some replies react with astonishment: “Wait, this whole thing is AI?” — a mix of curiosity and skepticism about the production method.

Opposing

1

Outrage and condemnation:

Replies denounce the tweet as an explicit call to violence and demand the poster be reported and removed from the platform.

2

Law-enforcement warning:

Many say threats like "bomb the data centers" should be treated seriously and referred to police or platform safety teams.

3

Dismissal as hyperbole:

Some argue the line is rhetorical exaggeration, not a real plan, and urge not to overreact.

4

Sarcastic mockery:

Users ridicule the dramatic wording and the author's credibility rather than engage seriously.

5

Free-speech vs. moderation debate:

A thread of replies warns against overbroad censorship, insisting context matters and that harsh moderation can be abused.

6

Practical concern for public safety and services:

Commenters highlight the real-world harm such attacks would cause—disrupting emergency services, businesses and individuals—and call for nonviolent solutions.

Top Reactions

Most popular replies, ranked by engagement

G

@GlitterPixely

Supporting

Character sheet: Generate a professional character bible sheet, strictly matching this layout format: - White background, light gray fine grid lines, modular sections. - Top left: Character name in ALL CAPS + katakana + role subtitle. - Left column: Character base info (ROLE,

4
1
318
G

@GlitterPixely

Supporting

Tools I used: Chatgpt Image V2 and Nano Banana 2 on @AdobeFirefly Seedance on @dreamina_ai Upscaling on @topazlabs Stitching and editing on @capcutapp ♥

4
0
309
G

@GlitterPixely

Supporting

The girl (Luna) I generated with @NanoBanana but used @ChatGPTapp Image V2 for the 3 story boards I used. The prompts are: 1⃣ 生成一张专业影视分镜表图片,严格复刻以下布局格式: - 白色背景,黑色粗网格线,顶部对齐的5列表格。 - 第一列:黑色圆圈编号 ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥。 -

3
1
210
B

@balearicfboy

Opposing

Awful , bomb the data centers

0
0
2

This article was AI-generated from real-time signals discovered by PureFeed.

PureFeed scans X/Twitter 24/7 and turns the noise into actionable intelligence. Create your own signals and get a personalized feed of what actually matters.

Report an Issue

Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.