STOCK_MARKET
AI Analysis
Live Data

FPI Outflows Since 2018: Data Shows Policy Impact Explained

Infographic: FPI selling trends since 2018—data-driven look at LTCG/STT policy effects vs valuation explanations, including ₹3.5 lakh crore outflows in 2021–22.

@_KiranRajputposted on X

Many fund managers and 'experts' are talking nonsense when they claim FIIs are selling just because Indian markets are 'expensive.' The truth is in the timeline: they’ve been selling since 2018, the moment the government introduced LTCG and hiked STT. Look at the data—in 2021 and 2022 alone, they dumped ₹3.5 lakh crore. This isn't a valuation issue; it's a policy issue.

View original tweet on X →
Infographic related to the article topic

Source: Mint (livemint.com)

Research Brief

What our analysis found

A viral tweet claims that Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) have been continuously selling Indian equities since 2018, driven primarily by the reintroduction of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) tax and successive hikes in the Securities Transaction Tax (STT), rather than by valuation concerns. The tweet further asserts that FPIs dumped ₹3.5 lakh crore in 2021 and 2022 alone. While the policy grievance has genuine roots—LTCG at 10% on gains above ₹1 lakh was reintroduced in the Union Budget 2018, and STT on options was raised from 0.05% to 0.0625% in 2023 and further to 0.1% in 2024—the actual flow data tells a far more complicated story.

NSDL-based tallies show that after a net outflow of approximately ₹33,000–34,100 crore in 2018, FPIs returned as strong net buyers in subsequent years: ₹1.01 lakh crore in 2019, ₹1.70 lakh crore in 2020, and roughly ₹25,752 crore in 2021. The heaviest single-year selling came in 2022, at about ₹1.21 lakh crore in equities, but this was followed by a massive reversal in 2023, when FPIs poured in approximately ₹1.71 lakh crore—one of the highest annual inflows on record. The claim that ₹3.5 lakh crore was pulled out across 2021 and 2022 is not supported by the data; 2021 was in fact a year of modest net inflows, and 2022's outflows were around ₹1.21 lakh crore.

Analysts and industry bodies have indeed flagged India's layered tax structure—including LTCG, STT, and surcharges—as persistent "irritants" that reduce post-tax returns for foreign investors. The Budget 2026 proposal to raise STT on options to 0.15% and futures to 0.05% from April 2026 triggered an immediate market sell-off. However, multiple experts attribute the large 2022 and 2025 outflows primarily to global factors: U.S. Federal Reserve rate hikes, a surging dollar, and elevated Indian equity valuations relative to peers such as China, which staged a sharp rally in late 2024. The reality, therefore, is far more nuanced than a single-cause policy narrative.

Fact Check

Evidence from both sides

Supporting Evidence

1

2018 outflows coincided with LTCG reintroduction

: FPIs pulled out approximately ₹33,000–34,100 crore in 2018, the first calendar-year net selling since 2011, shortly after the 10% LTCG tax was announced in Budget 2018. Media reports and op-eds attributed part of the exodus to the new tax, according to Indian Express and Business Today.

2

Sharp Q2 2018 selling linked to tax policy

: In just April–June 2018, FPI equity outflows totaled roughly ₹61,132 crore, with coverage citing the newly introduced LTCG tax as a contributing factor, per Business Today.

3

Industry has repeatedly flagged tax irritants

: FPIs and market participants have consistently identified India's LTCG, STT, and surcharge structure as factors that reduce post-tax returns and can deter foreign participation, with formal calls to review the capital-gains regime during periods of outflows, as reported by Financial Express.

4

Budget 2026 STT hike triggered immediate backlash

: The steep increase in STT on futures and options announced in February 2026 drew sharp industry criticism and was cited by analysts as a fresh headwind for FPI participation, particularly for derivatives-oriented foreign funds, according to Business Standard.

5

Cumulative tax burden has risen substantially since 2018

: LTCG was raised from 10% to 12.5% in Budget 2024, STCG was hiked to 20%, and STT on options has tripled from 0.05% to 0.15% over three years, creating a progressively heavier tax load on foreign investors that did not exist before 2018.

Contradicting Evidence

1

FPIs were not continuous net sellers since 2018

: The claim of selling "since 2018" is factually incorrect. FPIs were sizeable net buyers in 2019 (approximately ₹1.01 lakh crore), 2020 (approximately ₹1.70 lakh crore), 2021 (approximately ₹25,752 crore), and 2023 (approximately ₹1.71 lakh crore), per NSDL data reported by Times of India and NDTV Profit.

2

The ₹3.5 lakh crore figure for 2021–2022 is unsupported

: In 2021, FPIs were net buyers (roughly ₹25,752 crore to ₹50,089 crore depending on the data source), not sellers. The 2022 equity outflow was approximately ₹1.21 lakh crore. Even combining the most aggressive estimates, the total does not approach ₹3.5 lakh crore for those two years.

3

2022 outflows were driven largely by global macro factors

: The record FPI selling in 2022 coincided with aggressive U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate hikes, a surging dollar, and a global risk-off environment—factors widely cited by analysts as the primary drivers, not domestic tax policy alone.

4

2023 inflows contradict the policy-exit narrative

: If tax policy were the dominant deterrent, it is difficult to explain why FPIs returned with approximately ₹1.71 lakh crore in net equity inflows in 2023—one of the highest totals ever—despite LTCG and STT remaining in force and STT on derivatives having just been hiked in April 2023.

5

Valuation and relative-return factors are well-documented drivers

: The massive 2024-end and 2025 sell-off of approximately ₹1.56–1.66 lakh crore has been widely attributed by analysts to elevated Indian valuations (Nifty trading at significant premiums to emerging-market peers) and a rotation into cheaper markets such as China, which staged a sharp rally, rather than to any new tax measure at that time.

Report an Issue

Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.