S
@slap__tjips
Just in time for the AI bubble burst
645
1
16.0K
@Polymarketposted on X
BREAKING: Intel shares officially recover all losses from the 2000 dot-com bubble burst.
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
66% Engaged
40% Positive
26% Negative
Positive
40%
Negative
26%
Neutral
34%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
Diamond hands
Many replies celebrate relentless HODLers — patience paid off after decades and OG investors are getting credited for holding through the tough years.
2
26 years of bagholding
jokes: A flood of humor and mockery — grandpa/Pentium‑3 memes, “finally broke even,” and disbelief at taking a quarter century to recover.
3
AI / CPU boom
as the catalyst: Numerous commenters attribute the comeback to AI, chip demand, and recent tech strength — Intel’s relevance restored by structural industry shifts.
4
Exit-now
opportunists: Some ask “what’s the exit plan?” and urge selling while green — treating the rally as a chance to realize gains.
5
Still bullish
A subset insists Intel remains undervalued and that the run is just beginning — calls for continued conviction rather than cashing out.
6
Bubble caution
A few warn this looks like a new dot‑com era or a revved-up bubble, urging skepticism despite the dramatic recovery.
7
Tax-loss grief
and irony: Several replies lament ruined loss-harvesting strategies or poke fun at investors who missed the opportunity to lock in tax benefits because the stock finally recovered.
Opposing
1
Adjust for inflation:
Counting monetary debasement, long-term Intel holders are reported to be still materially underwater (about 45% down).
2
AI bubble skepticism:
The rally is widely characterized as driven by AI hype and likely to pop when that cycle fades.
3
Opportunity cost vs. index funds:
Holding Intel since 2000 is framed as a lost chance—$10K in the S&P then ≈ $65K today, while Intel holders waited decades to merely recover nominal value.
4
Fundamentals overvaluation:
Critics point to cash burn, foundry losses, sky-high forward P/E and argue the current valuation isn’t justified by the company’s recent product progress.
5
Distrust and market-manipulation claims:
Threads allege fake shares, naked shorting and note a contentious claim that the U.S. government holds a large stake.
6
Dot‑com-era parallels:
Commenters draw a line to the 1999–2000 peak—market-cap and hype comparisons underline a narrative of long recovery and cyclical boom/bust.
7
Sell-now sentiment:
A vocal slice of replies urges action—“dump it” / “time to go home”—or boasts about having sold years ago to avoid the long drawdown.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
T
@thesincerevp
26 years to break even. in nominal terms. adjust for inflation and you're still down about 45%. meanwhile $10K in the S&P in January 2000 is worth ~$65K today. Intel holders spent a quarter century recovering money that would've 6x'd in an index fund doing nothing
300
7
15.8K
F
@FulMetalCapital
$INTC holders since 2000 :
204
0
9.3K
B
@burrytracker
never thought id see the day
64
2
3.9K
M
@MatrixAscender
Taking inflation into account, this is retarded for a retard 🤣
42
0
5.8K
L
@LeifInvests
We got any people who held all the way through? $INTC
23
4
8.8K
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.