A
@artbrokerdealer
MAGA retards: “our country made $30 billion. Now let’s give it to Israel”
189
4
5.5K
@KobeissiLetterposted on X
BREAKING: President Trump says the US government is now up over $30 billion since he decided to buy Intel stock, $INTC, in August 2025. "I'm very proud of that company," Trump says. https://t.co/YNm4aWVHgM
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
68% Engaged
22% Positive
46% Negative
Positive
22%
Negative
46%
Neutral
32%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
$30B taxpayer gain
Many celebrate the headline as a clear financial win for the American people, framing the Intel position as “money earned” for taxpayers and proof the government can make profitable investments.
2
Industrial policy / national security
Supporters argue the purchase wasn’t just about profits but about securing the US semiconductor supply chain and restoring domestic chip manufacturing.
3
Lock in profits vs bragging
Traders and skeptics warn the gain is largely unrealized and urge the government to sell now and lock in rather than publicly touting paper gains.
4
Government picking winners = socialism
Critics say this is undue market intervention, accusing officials of “picking winners,” promoting a socialist-style approach, and highlighting hypocrisy in political elites profiting from state action.
5
Spend it or pay down debt
A common demand: if the gain is realized, use proceeds to reduce national debt, cut taxes, or deliver direct payments to citizens.
6
Scale the model
Some replies push for institutionalizing the approach — creating a sovereign wealth fund or repeating similar investments in other companies (TSLA, Spirit) to steer national capital allocation.
7
Context matters
Several voices point out this $30B can be dwarfed by tariffs, war costs, or other fiscal policies, arguing the headline profit isn’t a cure-all for broader budget problems.
8
Polarized reactions — worship and mockery
Responses span from adoration (“He is the Sun”) to sarcasm and partisan jabs, showing the story is as much political theatre as finance.
Opposing
1
Government shouldn’t own or trade private equities
critics call it crony capitalism, “socialism” or “communism,” arguing taxpayer money mustn’t be used to pick winners and losers in the market.
2
Allegations of insider trading and market manipulation
many accuse the president and his allies of “talking his book,” enriching family/cronies, and committing corruption that could be impeachable or criminal.
3
The $30B is paper until realized
repeated pushback that unrealized gains don’t equal cash and the headline number is misleading unless shares are sold.
4
Taxpayers won’t see the benefit
resentment that any gains will fund wars or allied priorities (frequent mentions of Israel/Iran), while ordinary Americans face higher costs and no direct payoff.
5
Retail investors get hurt by pump-and-dump dynamics
users warn a presidential endorsement inflates prices only for big players to “sell and dump the bags” on small investors.
6
It’s a rounding error against the national debt
several point out $30B is trivial next to ~$40T of federal debt, so the claim is politically loud but economically minor.
7
Claims need verification
a number of replies urge skepticism: “show the receipts,” note that governments don’t typically “day-trade” stocks, and question the accuracy of the narrative.
8
Industry fundamentals matter
some thread-level replies argue Intel’s challenges (lagging semiconductors, foundry risk, AMD competition) make the price move fragile and liable to reverse if the market prices reality.
9
Role separation and credibility are at stake
commentators warn that policymakers holding positions in firms they influence distorts pricing and undermines trust; public officials shouldn’t act like portfolio managers.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
S
@snowytrade
Intel is no different to Palantir. Their scam only lasts until Trump goes to jail.
108
4
4.4K
C
@CryptoIntelPlug
Never mind that the government isn't a hedge fund, and presidents don't normally brag about equity stakes like they're day trading from the Oval Office. But sure, let's add "stock picker" to the resume
90
4
8.5K
S
@SlepeOnBase
the president is now a retail investor who brags about unrealized gains.
47
1
4.2K
A
@alifarhat79
Top
42
1
2.8K
K
@k2__investment
Trump watching unrealized gains at $INTC 😏
15
0
1.2K
Report an Issue
Found something wrong with this article? Let us know and we'll look into it.